Medicina (Kaunas) 2008; 44 (9): 706-712

Contents   Full text article in English

Free radical-scavenging activities of Crataegus monogyna extracts

Jurga Bernatonienė, Rūta Masteikova1, Daiva Majienė, Arūnas Savickas, Egidijus Kėvelaitis2, Rūta Bernatonienė3, Katerina Dvoráčková1, Genuvaitė Civinskienė2, Raimundas Lekas2, Konradas Vitkevičius4, Rimantas Pečiūra

Department of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania, 1University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic, 2Department of Physiology, 3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, 4Department of Analytical and Toxicological Chemistry, Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania

Key words: free radicals; antioxidant activity.

Summary. The aim of this study was to investigate antiradical activity of aqueous and ethanolic hawthorn fruit extracts, their flavonoids, and flavonoid combinations.

Material and methods. Total amount of phenolic compounds and the constituents of flavonoids were determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography. The antioxidant activity of Crataegus monogyna extracts and flavonoids (chlorogenic acid, hyperoside, rutin, quercetin, vitexin-2O-rhamnoside, epicatechin, catechin, and procyanidin B2) quantitatively was determined using the method of spectrophotometry (diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH·) radical scavenging assay and 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)(ABTS·+) radical cation decolorization assay). The level of tyrosine nitration inhibition was determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results. Ethanolic hawthorn fruit extract contained 182±4 mg/100 mL phenolic compounds, i.e. threefold more, as compared to aqueous extract. The antioxidant activity according to DPPH· reduction in the ethanolic extracts was higher 2.3 times (P<0.05). The ABTS·+ technique showed that the effect of ethanolic extracts was by 2.5 times stronger than that of aqueous extracts. Tyrosine nitration inhibition test showed that the effect of ethanolic extracts was by 1.4 times stronger than that of aqueous extracts. The investigation of the antiradical activity of the active constituents in aqueous and ethanolic extracts revealed that epicatechin and catechin contribute to radical-scavenging properties more than other components. Procyanidin B2 only insignificantly influenced the antiradical activity of the extracts.

Conclusion. Both aqueous and ethanolic hawthorn extracts had antiradical activity, but ethanolic extract had stronger free radical-scavenging properties, compared to the aqueous extract. The antioxidant activity of the studied preparations was mostly conditioned by epicatechin and catechin. The individual constituents of both extracts had weaker free radical-scavenging properties than the combination of these substances did.

Correspondence to J. Bernatonienė, Department of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Kaunas University of Medicine, A. Mickevičiaus 9, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania. E-mail: jurgabernatoniene@yahoo.com

Received 7 November 2007, accepted 6 June 2008